86 N.C. App. 165 - Boudreau v. Baughman’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2007
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc. · Bernick v. Jurden · Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp. · Bolick v. American Barmag Corp. · Mills v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]plaintiff must prove the condition precedent that the cause of action is brought no “more than six years after the date of initial purchase [of the product] for use or consumption.” A plaintiff must also meet the time limitation of the applicable procedural statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.