Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Nev. 173 - Laney v. State

Laney v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Vincze v. State (1970), Sheriff of Washoe County v. Martin (1983)

27 state decisions

20019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Todd v. Peninsular & Occidental Steamship Co. · Medrano v. United States · Duke v. United States · Hayes v. United States · Langley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““2. Allegations made in one count may be incorporated by reference in another count. It may be alleged in a single count that the means by which the defendant committed the offense are unknown or that he committed it by one or more specified means. “3. The indictment or information shall state for each count the official or customary citation of the statute, rule, regulation or other provision of law which the defendant is alleged therein to have violated. Error in the citation or its omission shall not be ground for dismissal of the indictment or information or for reversal of a conviction if the error or omission did not mislead the defendant to his prejudice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the [charging document] standing alone must contain the elements of the offense intended to be charged and must be sufficient to apprise the accused of the nature of the offense so that he may adequately prepare a defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.