Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Nev. 736 - Shuff v. State

Shuff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2001

21 state decisions

1401970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Huff · Walker v. State · Langley v. State · Morford v. State · Scott v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the competency of any witness has been questioned, it is within the discretion of the trial court to consider factors relative to qualification and to determine if such person is competent to testify.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts ... or of relating them truly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.