Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Nev. 798 - In Re Austin

In Re Austin’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Teeter · Weaver v. United States · Ex Parte Wheeler · State v. McFarlin · Polito v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When presented with an application [for bail pending appeal], neither the court nor any of its justices should conduct a separate fact-finding proceeding. Seldom will the trial transcript or record be available to the court or its members to aid in passing on such a bail application here. Accordingly, we must make our independent judgment on a review of the reasons relied upon by the lower court. 11”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.