State v. Barry’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019 · most notably State v. Hartley (1986), Barry v. New Jersey (1981)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Dunaway v. New York · Elkins v. United States · Johnson v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the temporal proximity of the arrest and the confession, the presence of intervening circumstances, and, particularly, the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“By focusing on `the causal connection between the illegality and the confession,' the attenuation doctrine serves to indicate when exclusion is necessary to further the purpose of deterrence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Pham v. State“The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct and to preserve the integrity of the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.