Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 N.M. 39 - State v. Vallejos

State v. Vallejos’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
3
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 92 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably State v. Martin (1984), State v. Smith (1979)

2 federal appellate · 92 state decisions

36019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · State v. Garcia · 39 Cal. 2d 719 - People v. Kirkes · State v. Rowell · State v. Gutierrez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e consider the cumulative impact of the three items of misconduct. An accumulation of irregularities, each of which, in itself, might be deemed harmless may, in the aggregate, show the absence of a fair trial. “A fair trial is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” (citation omitted). An appellate court has the responsibility “to see that a person convicted of crime shall have a fair trial with a proper defense, and that no conviction shall stand because of the absence of either.” (citation omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A lawyer shall not . . . in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.