Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 N.M. 581 - Harrison v. Lucero

Harrison v. Lucero’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Gallegos v. Citizens Insurance Agency (1989), Bennett v. Kisluk (1991)

28 state decisions

10019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jacobson v. Parrill · Kelleher v. Lozzi · Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance · Lugena v. Hanna · 18 N.C. App. 282 - McKinney v. Morrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Release obtained by Aetna did not contain an express reservation of the right of Susan Landin and Current Electric to make a claim against Tommy M. Yates for injuries and damages sustained in the aforesaid collision and that, therefore, said Release constituted an accord and satisfaction of all claims between them arising out of the aforesaid collision, thereby estopping Susan Landin from proceeding against Tommy M. Yates in this cause; Landin appeals. We reverse.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Since under * * * [the doctrine of respondeat superior] “* * * [t]he liability of the master to a third person for injuries by a servant in the course of his employment and within the scope of his authority, is derivative and secondary, while that of the servant is primary, and absent any delict of the master other than through the servant, exoneration of the servant removes the foundation upon which to impute negligence to the master.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.