Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 N.M. 707 - Chisholm v. Scott

Chisholm v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
20
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably 408 Ill. App. 3d 564 - Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLP (2011), Investors REIT One v. Jacobs (1989)

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 64 state decisions — followed in 20 states

27019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6155 · 26 U.S.C. § 6501 · 26 U.S.C. § 743

Relies on 6 Cal. 3d 176 - Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand · Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. Delgado · Moonie v. Lynch · Roybal v. White · Spurlin v. Paul Brown Agency, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[al person needs special training to know whether his or her tax return has been erroneously prepared.... In the relationship of accountant and client, the trust and confidence that the client places in the professional person places him in a vulnerable position should that trust and confidence be misplaced. It is the policy of the law to encourage that trust and confidence; likewise it is the duty of the law to protect the client from the negligent acts of the professional person.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the statute may not be deemed to have run until four years after notice had been given by the IRS.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.