Volume 86 — New York Supreme Court Reports

Appeal by the defendant, R. Irving Davis, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 28th day of December, 1893, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Monroe Special Term, and also from the order directing judgment, ■entered in said clerk’s office on the 28th day of December, 1893, with notice of an intention to bring up for review on such appeal the interlocutory…

Appeal by the defendants, Henry M. Reichenbach and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 17th day of April, 1893, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Monroe Special Term enjoining and restraining the defendants from using or in any manner divulging or imparting any knowledge or information acquired by them in regard to certain processes, formulae and…

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Richard Miller and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 6th day of April, 1893, upon the decision of the court rendered at the Monroe Special Term dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint upon the merits and for costs.

<p>Surrogate’s Court — decision as to an applicant’s interest — refusal to compel an accounting when an action for that purpose ispending_ in the Supreme Court.</p> <p>■When tlie papers used upon an application made to a Surrogate’s Court show that the applicant has no interest in the matter to which the application relates, although the applicant swears that he has an interest therein, the surrogate is not bound to entertain the application.</p> <p>Where a person has commenced an action to compel an accounting in the Supreme Court, it is not error for a Surrogate’s Court to refuse to entertain an independent proceeding attempted to be brought in that court by such person for the same purpose.</p>

Appeal by tlie defendants, Tlie New York Elevated Railroad Company and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on tlie 19th day of January, 1891, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term.

Appeal by William II. Patterson from a decree of tlie Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York, entered in the office of the clerk of the New York County Surrogate’s Court on the 3d day of November, Í892, confirming the report of a referee and revoking, setting aside and annulling the letters of administration granted to him and the decree passing and settling his accounts as administrator, with costs against the said William II. Patterson personally.