86 Ohio App. 3d 123 - Cherry v. Figart’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2026
2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoyt v. Hoyt · 42 Ohio App. 3d 155 - In Re Dissolution of Marriage of Seders · 61 Ohio App. 2d 88 - Greiner v. Greiner · Colley v. Colley · 78 Ohio App. 3d 599 - King v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While a trial court does not have the power to modify the terms of a separation agreement entered into between the parties, R.C. 3105.65(B) provides that it does have full power to enforce the provisions of such an agreement which has been incorporated into a decree of dissolution of marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a trial court always retains full power to enforce the provisions of a divorce decree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maanu v. Bobie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.