86 Ohio App. 3d 327 - In Re Pryor’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
87 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 89 Ohio App. 3d 35 - Stewart v. B.F. Goodrich Co. (1993), 142 Ohio App. 3d 193 - In Re Brown (2001)
87 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Stanley v. Illinois · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Place the child in protective supervision; (2) Commit the child to the temporary custody of a public children services agency, a private child placing agency, either parent, a relative residing within or outside the state, or a probation officer for placement in a certified foster home or in any other home approved by the court; (3) Award legal custody of the child to either parent or to any other person who, prior to the dispositional hearing, files a motion requesting legal custody of the child; (4) Commit the child to the permanent custody of a public children services agency or private child placing agency, * * *; or (5) Place the child in a planned permanent living arrangement with a public children services agency or private child placing agency, * * *.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under this standard, there is no definitive test or set of criteria for the court to apply, rather, a court `should consider the totality of the circumstances, including, to the extent they are applicable, the best interest factors set forth in R.C. 3109.04 (F).'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“the primary, if not only, consideration.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.