Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

86 Ohio App. 3d 407

621 N.E.2d 513

State v. Swift

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1993

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1993-02-16

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-02-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably State v. Fitzpatrick (2004), 123 Ohio App. 3d 400 - State v. Higgs (1997)

76 state decisions

3701993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Joseph E. Mahoney, Judge,

¶1 dissenting.

¶2 I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion in resolving the first assignment of error.

¶3 The record clearly demonstrates that appellant knowingly and voluntarily entered a guilty plea and was not mentally incompetent at the time of rendering such plea. It is evident from the representations of appellant’s counsel as well as the exchange between the court and appellant that appellant knew and understood the charges against him and did not deny his participation in the offense. *417 It is also clear that appellant wanted treatment and did not want to put his family through a trial.

¶4 Based on the record, I conclude that appellant’s plea was made knowingly, understanding^, and voluntarily.

/86/ohioapp3d/407 · .json · Public domain