86 Ohio App. 3d 679 - State v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1994
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Mughni · 31 Ohio App. 3d 118 - State v. Torres · 50 Ohio App. 3d 69 - City of Dayton v. McLaughlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When appellant knowingly offered to sell Percodan, a controlled substance, his offense was complete under R.C. 2925.03(A)(1). State v. Scott (1982), 69 Ohio St.2d 439 , 23 O.O.3d 390 , 432 N.E.2d 798 . There need be no additional proof that appellant knew that the substance he was offering was not Percodan or that it was actually a counterfeit controlled substance. Proof of such knowledge and of the counterfeit character of the substance offered is necessary for a conviction under R.C. 2925.37(B). Thus, commission of the first offense will not necessarily result in commission of the second offense. The offenses are, therefore, not allied, and appellant may be convicted of both.” (Emphasis sic.) Id. at 67-68, 514 N.E.2d at 872-873 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.