In re Snow’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Rios
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(C) If an award of reparations is made to a claimant under sections 2743.51 to 2743.72 of the Revised Code and if it is discovered that the claimant actually was not eligible for the award or that the award otherwise should not have been made under the standards and criteria set forth in sections 2743.51 to 2743.72 of the Revised Code, the attorney general is entitled to recover the award from the claimant. * * * ” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Ford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.