Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 OHIOST3D 375 - State v. Wharf

State v. Wharf’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably State v. Colon (2008), State v. Horner (2010)

80 state decisions

6301999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chimel v. California · State v. Brown · State v. Merriweather · 10 Ohio App. 3d 207 - State v. Crawford · 79 Ohio App. 3d 600 - State v. McSwain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o establish a violation of R.C. 2911.02 (A)(1), it is not necessary to prove a specific mental state regarding the deadly weapon element of the offense of robbery.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense, as defined in Section 2913.01 of the Revised Code, or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense, shall do any of the following: {¶ 52} (1) Have a deadly weapon on or about the offender's person or under the offender;s control and either display the weapon, brandish it, indicate the offender possesses it, or use it.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the General Assembly intended that a theft offense, committed while an offender was in possession or control of a deadly weapon, is robbery and no intent beyond that required for the theft offense must be proven.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.