Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Okla. 279 - Callahan v. Nida

Callahan v. Nida’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 1936
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bramell v. Adams · Harper v. Stumpff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. “In the case at bar we have examined the assignments of error and the briefs of the respective parties, and we are clear from an examination of the same and the record in the cause that there appears no reversible error in the record. Therefore the appeal is dismissed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where the parties have undertaken, by one appeal upon one petition in error and one case-made, to reverse two or more judgments, this court will dismiss such an attempted appeal for duplicity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.