State v. Williamson’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 94 Wash. 2d 634 - State v. Delmarter · 85 Wash. 2d 758 - State v. Gosby · 114 Wash. 2d 77 - State v. Rempel · 122 Wash. 2d 712 - State v. Hansen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of tampering with a witness if he or she attempts to induce a witness or person he or she has reason to believe is about to be called as a witness in any official proceeding . . . to: (a) Testify falsely or, without right or privilege to do so, to withhold any testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitfield“A person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if, with intent to commit a specific crime, he or she does any act which is a substantial step toward the commission of that crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitfield“A person tampers with a witness if he attempts to alter the witness's testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitfield
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.