Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 P.3d 166 - State v. Korum

State v. Korum’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Koon v. United States · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Blackledge v. Perry · United States v. Goodwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough some significant increase in sentence recommendation is to be expected when a defendant rebuffs a plea bargain and puts the State to the risk and expense of a trial, nonetheless, this increase cannot be of a magnitude that suggests vindictive retaliation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[u]nderlying this exponential increase in sentencing, in part, was the State's doubling the number of charges after Korum withdrew his guilty plea and requested a trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We agree with Korum that Green requires dismissal of the kidnapping charges here because they were incidental to the robberies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.