State v. Saunders’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2023
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Dixon · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) `the type of witness involved,' (2) `the specific nature of the testimony,' (3) `the nature of the charges,' (4) `the type of defense, and' (5) `the other evidence before the trier of fact.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kirkman“intentional murder in the first degree or, in the alternative, felony murder based on rape,robbery, and kidnapping.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Muhammad“the predicate crimes and the murder [were] not sufficiently intertwined for application of the merger doctrine”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Muhammad
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.