Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 PACOMMW 128 - Commonwealth v. Smith

Commonwealth v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 8 Pa. Commw. 6 - Baron v. Civil Service Commission · Omelchenko v. HOUS. AUTH., CO. OF LEBANON. · Warner v. Civil Service Commission · 80 Pa. Commw. 486 - Warren State Hospital v. Yaegle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The appointing authority in a Civil Service case has no burden to prove that the employee who has been disciplined for failure to follow an important work rule has done so intentionally or with prurient motive unless it has charged the employee with having such intention or motive. Warren State Hospital v. Yaegle, 80 Pa. Com monwealth Ct. 486, 471 A.2d 1302 (1984) (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.