Swackhammer v. Commonwealth

¶1Opinion by

¶2Russell L. Swaekhammer, Hazel D. Ellenberger and Cynthia Lynn Floravit (Claimants) appeal from Unemployment Compensation Board of Review decisions which affirmed a referee’s determinations that Claimants were financially ineligible for benefits under Section 404 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1

¶3The sole question is whether workmen’s compensation benefit payments were improperly excluded *295from the calculation of base year wages for the purposes of determining Claimants’ financial eligibility for unemployment compensation. To qualify for unemployment benefits, an eligible claimant must be attached to the labor force as determined by the amount of wages earned in a base year.2

¶4Claimants had insufficient base year wages under Section 404, because the referee (as affirmed by the board) determined that Claimants’ workmen’s compensation benefit payments were not wages within the intendment of Section 4(x) of the Law,3 and could not, therefore, be included in base year wages necessary for financial eligibility.

¶5Section 4(x) defines “wages,” in pertinent part, as including “all remuneration . . . paid by an employer to an individual with respect to his employment.” Essential to the definition of “wages” as including all remuneration paid with respect to employment is the meaning of the terms ‘ employment ’ ’ and “remuneration.” “Employment” means “all personal service performed for remuneration,” Section 4(1) (1) of the Law,4 and “remuneration,” while not statutorily defined, has been judicially interpreted to mean “payment for services performed.” The Beistle Company v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 73 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 205, 207, 457 A.2d 1029, 1030 (1983) (citing Gianfelice Unemployment Compensation Case, 396 Pa. 545, 555, 153 A.2d 906, 911 (1959)). Consequently, the inclusion of work*296men’s compensation benefits in base year qualifying wages requires that such payments be made in consideration of personal services performed by Claimants.

¶6In Karamanian v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 46 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 163, 405 A.2d 1364 (1979), employer provided salary continuation payments, which were made on account of a Claimant’s disability, and, therefore, not in consideration of personal services performed, were held not to constitute wages under Section 4(x) of the Law. Workmen’s compensation benefits are awarded whenever an employee sustains a totally or partially disabling work-related injury.5 Since workmen’s compensation payments were awarded to Claimants on account of their job-related disabilities, and not in consideration of personal services rendered, such payments are not wages within the purview of the Law. Id.The board, therefore, properly excluded workmen’s compensation payments from the calculation of Claimants’ base year qualifying wages.

¶7We accordingly affirm the orders of the board.

¶8Order in 309 C.D. 1983

¶9And Now, this 5th day of December, 1984, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review at Decision No. B-213558, dated January 12, 1983, is affirmed.

¶10Order in 1025 C.D. 1983

¶11And Now, this 5th day of December, 1984, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of *297Review at Decision No. B-216306, dated March 28, 1983, is affirmed.

¶12Order, in 1212 O.D. 1983

¶13And Now, this 5th day of December, 1984, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review at Decision No. B-217765, dated May 3, 1983, is affirmed.