Anderson v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1982
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stanford v. Stanford · Huckfeldt v. Huckfeldt · Howells v. Howells · Hines v. Hines · Larson v. Larson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At the divorce with the plaintiff present and having signed a custody agreement which referred to only the four children of these parties, there exists in the birth of another child special circumstances which should permit the Court to go behind its previous determination in these custody matters. In Miller v. Miller, 15 Wis.2d 583 , 113 N.W.2d 403 , the Wisconsin Court, without discarding the rule of res adjudicata [sic], recognized that there exist special conditions which should permit a Court to go behind its previous determination in these custody matters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kolb v. Kolb“the Court acted within its proper discretion and that there is sufficient competent evidence to support his action in changing custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kolb v. Kolb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.