Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 SO2D 115 - Bryant v. Parr

Bryant v. Parr’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
April 1977
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1977

8 state decisions

60195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brantley v. Clarkson · Paderas v. Stauffer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The testimony concerning the injuries of Miss Parr does not convince us that they were sufficiently serious to justify an award. She did not go to a doctor. She merely went to a druggist who put some medicine on it and that seems to have been the end of her suffering. De minimis non curat lex." ( 86 So.2d at 119 .)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.