Stewart v. Mack’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hoodless v. Jernigan · Morgareidge v. Howey · 74 So. 2d 59 - Slatcoff v. Dezen · Robinson v. United States · Cannon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * But the real question is whether the findings entered in connection with the final decree are supported by competent substantial evidence, and we hold that this question must be answered in the affirmative and that the case is controlled, as the chancellor held, by Bruce’s Juices, Inc., v. King, Fla., 1951, 61 So.2d 175 . * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.