James v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United States · Amiker v. Drugs for Less, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“though 'acutely aware of the hazards connected with retrospective competency hearings,' nevertheless 'has repeatedly sanctioned nunc pro tunc proceedings where there is sufficient data available to guarantee reliability.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the purposes of Rule 9.06 were satisfied”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.