Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

86 S.W.3d 475

Duvall v. Calicott

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 2002

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2002-10-15

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2019

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Appellant David Duvall (“Duvall”) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his suit against respondents Michael Calicott and James Maxey. This dismissal was entered upon the trial court’s finding that Duvall’s suit was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/86/sw3d/475 · .json · Public domain