Salazar v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Warszower v. United States · Gribble v. State · Self v. State · Fisher v. State · 154 Tex. Crim. 438 - Watson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person having cause to believe that a child's physical or mental health or welfare has been adversely affected by abuse or neglect by any person shall immediately make a report as provided by this subchapter,”); Tex. Fam. Code § 261.109(a) (“A person commits an offense if the person is required to make a report under Section 261.101(a) and knowingly fails to make a report as provided in this chapter.”). . The record does not contain evidence about the result of that report. The State objected to its relevance. . A police officer testifying for the State explained that the father”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradford v. State“The rule requiring corroboration of confessions protects the administration of the criminal law against errors in convictions based upon untrue confessions alone.”); East v. State, 146 Tex.Crim. 396 , 175 S.W.2d 603, 605 (Tex.Crim.App.1942) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carrizales v. State“The corpus delicti rule guarded against the shocking spectacle and deleterious effect upon the criminal justice system when a murder victim suddenly reappeared, hale and hearty, after his self-confessed murderer had been tried and executed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nisbett, Rex Allen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.