Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 U.S. 254 - Kitchen v. Rayburn

Kitchen v. Rayburn’s Empirical Analysis

86 U.S. 254 · 1873

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2016 · most notably Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co. (1933), Sturm v. Boker (1893)

23 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

70187318801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Rio Grande

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can never be exerted in behalf of one who has acted fraudulently, or who by deceit or any unfair means has gained an advantage”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “lend [the court's] power to assist or protect a fraud,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.