Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 U.S. 37 - Bulkley v. United States

Bulkley v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

86 U.S. 37 · 1873

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 1978
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1978 · most notably United States v. Behan (1884), Howard v. Stillwell Bierce Manuf'G Co (1891)

6 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

8018731880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Rio Grande

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in making ready to meet the requirements of the notice, he was subjected to the loss of time, to trouble and expense. Hfe is entitled to be paid accordingly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.