Ex parte Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
86 U.S. 505 · 1873
Citation profile
197 federal appellate · 40 district · 138 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 641 later decisions (55 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. (1991), Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath (1951)
197 federal appellate · 40 district · 138 state decisions — followed in 39 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 641 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The moment the courts of the United States were called into existence and invested with jurisdiction over any subject, they became possessed of this power.”
33 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““As thus seen, the power of these courts in the punishment of contempts can only be "exercised to insure order and decorum vn their presence, to secure faithfulness on the part of their officers in their official transactions, and to enforce obedience to their lawful orders, judgments, and processes.” (Italics ours).”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as— “(1) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice; . . . .” 18 U.S.C. § 401 . (Emphasis added)”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Savin · In re Chase
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.