Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 U.S. 611 - Packet Company v. Sickles

Packet Company v. Sickles’s Empirical Analysis

86 U.S. 611 · 1873

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2023 · most notably Tilghman v. Proctor (1888), Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. (1932)

15 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

1201873188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendants in various form prayed the court 1o instruct the jury that the measure of damages was the established rate for the license to use the invention, as ascertained by the sales made by plaintiffs of such license to others. If this was the true rule of estimating the damage, the bill of exceptions shows that a sufficient number of such licenses and the prices at which they were granted were in evidence to enable the jury to apply the principle to the case before them. And we are of tile oxiinion that this was the sound rule. In such case nothing can be more reasonable than that the price fixed by the patentee for the use of his invention, in his dealings with others, and submitted to by them before using it, should govern.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “converting the infringer into a trastee for the patentee as regards the profits thus made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.