State v. Gleason’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2007
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hammer v. United States · Stone v. State · State v. Keehn · 114 Cal. App. 293 - People v. Miller · State v. Durnam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is generally held that in the exercise of his right to question a witness, the judge should not indulge in extensive examination or usurp the function of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.