Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Utah 570 - Hampton v. Hampton

Hampton v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1983

7 state decisions

30193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dahlberg v. Dahlberg · Chaffee v. Chaffee · Rockwood v. Rockwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled in this court that in order to secure a change in a decree for alimony the moving party must allege and prove changed conditions arising since the entry of the decree which require, under rules of equity and justice, a change in the decree. Chaffee v. Chaffee, 63 Utah 261 , 225 P. 76 ; Rockwood v. Rockwood, 65 Utah 261 , 236 P. 457 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.