French v. Painter’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320D (§ 1171 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson · Teleguz v. Com. · 688 So. 2d 1385 - Pierce v. Heritage Properties, Inc. · Ford Motor Co. v. Benitez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A “fraud on the court” occurs where it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.