86 Wash. 2d 112 - State v. Kreck’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably State v. King (1982), 98 Wash. 2d 140 - State v. Parris (1982)
5 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pointer v. Texas · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Dutton v. Evans · Mattox v. United States · Mancusi v. Stubbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A record of an act, condition or event, shall in so far as relevant, be competent evidence if the custodian or other qualified witness testifies to its identity and the mode of its preparation, and if it was made in the regular course of business, at or near the time of the act, condition or event, and if, in the opinion of the court, the sources of information, method and time of preparation were such as to justify its admission.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Dowdell v. United States, 221 U.S. 325, 330 , 31 S.Ct. 590 [592], 55 L.Ed. 753 (1911). These exceptions are subject to modification and addition, so long as the purpose of the rule is not hindered: The exceptions are not even static, but may be enlarged from time to time if there is no material departure from the reason of the general rule. Synder [sic] v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 107 , 54 S.Ct. 330, 333 , 78 L.Ed. 674 , 90 A.L.R. 575 (1934); accord, State v. Ortego, 22 Wash.2d 552, 563 , 157 P.2d 320 , 159 A.L.R. 1232 (1945).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“recall the details of the transaction or event in question.” State v. Kreck, 86 Wn.2d 112, 120 , 542 P.2d 782 (1975). And, the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.