86 Wash. App. 253 - State v. Angelos’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2018
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cady v. Dombrowski · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · 100 Wash. 2d 686 - State v. Ringer · 97 Wash. 2d 562 - State v. Loewen · 98 Wis. 2d 345 - State v. Prober
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the use of the emergency exception is challenged on appeal, the reviewing court must satisfy itself that the claimed emergency was not simply a pretext for conducting an evidentiary search.... The search must not be primarily motivated by intent to arrest and seize evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ladson“[b]ecause the officer knew the mother had just overdosed, his immediate concern that drugs of some kind might be lying about in easy reach was fully justified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gibson“[t]he emergency nature of each situation must be evaluated on its own facts, and in relation to the scene as it reasonably appeared to the officer at the time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gibson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.