State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy · 56 Wash. App. 499 - Coggle v. Snow · 67 Wash. App. 157 - State v. Rehak · 94 Wash. 2d 810 - State v. Price
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every person who shall knowingly procure or offer any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office . . . shall be punished by imprisonment . . . or by a fine. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Conte
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.