Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Wash. App. 673 - Davidson v. Kitsap County

86 Wash. App. 673 - Davidson v. Kitsap County’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably 96 Wash. App. 581 - Schofield v. Spokane County (1999), Bowers v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd. (2000)

25 state decisions

210199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 100 Wash. 2d 660 - Rains v. State · 126 Wash. 2d 22 - Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n v. Island County · 65 Wash. App. 614 - State Ex Rel. Lige & Wm. B. Dickson Co. v. County of Pierce · 127 Wash. 2d 782 - Sunderland Family Treatment Services v. City of Pasco · 71 Wash. App. 367 - Freeburg v. City of Seattle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an increase in density from 18 to 25 lots, an increase in the number of detention ponds, and an addition of a one-half mile of bioswales. There was also an increase in open space area, a decrease in the minimum lot size as well as the average lot size, and a transfer to Public Utility District water.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Res judicata occurs when a prior judgment has a concurrence of identity in four respects with a subsequent action. There must be identity of (1) subject matter; (2) cause of action; (3) persons and parties; and (4) the quality of the persons for or against whom the claim is made."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the evidence and any reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party that prevailed in the highest forum exercising fact-finding authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.