State v. Ladson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Whren v. United States · 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall · 97 Wash. 2d 92 - State v. White · Fluor Corp. v. United States · 106 Wash. 2d 144 - State v. Stroud
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Officer Mack's selective enforcement of the traffic laws in this case, based on the ulterior purpose of intelligence gathering or gang-monitoring, constitutes an unconstitutional pretext search.... [A] reasonable officer on gang patrol would not have stopped Fogle's vehicle for the expired tabs violation in the absence of some other purpose or reason.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ladson“A party may present a ground for affirming a trial court decision which was not presented to the trial court if the record has been sufficiently developed to fairly consider the ground.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ladson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.