State v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Because the damage to [the victim's] house would not have occurred but for Coe's marijuana growing operation, we hold that there was a sufficient causal connection between the crime charged and the victim's damage. Further, because dry-rot, mold, and mildew damage were foreseeable consequences of venting warm moist air into the unheated apartment, we hold that restitution was appropriate here.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 334 Wis. 2d 415 - State v. Hoseman

2. “that growing marijuana is a 'victimless' crime and that the State's failure to charge him with vandalism or some other crime that includes an element of property damage makes restitution inappropriate.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 334 Wis. 2d 415 - State v. Hoseman

3. “unauthorized alterations to the house's electrical and ventilation systems to facilitate the manufacture of marijuana.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 334 Wis. 2d 415 - State v. Hoseman