Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Wis. 2d 304 - Neely v. State

86 Wis. 2d 304 - Neely v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 143 Wis. 2d 226 - State v. Sorenson (1988), State v. Davidson (2000)

27 state decisions

12019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Griffin v. California · Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. United Mine Workers of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the fifth amendment means anything, it not only means that the defendant has the right to refrain from making statements that might tend to incriminate him, but it also means that the exercise of that right will not be used against him later in a criminal proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[A]ll we can assume is that the defendant was satisfied with the court's ruling and curative measure, and that he had no further objections. The defendant took his chances with the jury, curative instruction and all.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.