Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 Wis. 2d 572 - Wright v. Hasley

86 Wis. 2d 572 - Wright v. Hasley’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 105 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2008 · most notably 136 Wis. 2d 304 - Green Spring Farms v. Kersten (1987), Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Buell (1987)

4 federal appellate · 105 state decisions

7901979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co. · 85 Wis. 2d 675 - Anderson v. Continental Insurance · 21 Wis. 2d 349 - Alsteen v. Gehl · 62 Wis. 2d 370 - School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . shall be rendered if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, to gether with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. . . .””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “no longer accord the trial court wide latitude in deciding to grant or deny summary judgment.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.