86 Wis. 2d 69 - Schilling v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably 117 Wis. 2d 701 - State v. Woods (1984), 167 Wis. 2d 672 - State v. Mitchell (1992)
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Escobedo v. Illinois · Massiah v. United States · Brewer v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While the state has the burden ‘to show beyond a reasonable doubt that statements or confessions are admissible, on review by this court the test is whether the findings by the trial court were contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.’ State v. Parker, 55 Wis.2d 131, 135 , 197 N.W.2d 742 (1972). See also Roney v. State, 44 Wis.2d 522, 533 , 171 N.W.2d 400 (1969), and State ex rel. Goodchild v. Burke, 27 Wis.2d 244 , 133 N.W.2d 753 (1965).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Since [the defendant] never invoked his fifth amendment right to counsel, the statement he signed ... is admissible if the State can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Jones knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“That a defendant has counsel does not automatically require exclusion of a statement obtained from him in counsel's absence provided the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Forbush
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.