Brown-Forman Corp. v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission’s Empirical Analysis
860 F.2d 1354 · 1988
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Exxon Corporation v. Governor of Maryland Shell Oil Company · Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. New York State Liquor Authority · Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reminiscent of Kant's categorical imperative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.