Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 860 F.2d 1363 - Owens v. Brock

Owens v. Brock’s Empirical Analysis

860 F.2d 1363 · 1988

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2015 · most notably Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1991), Baker v. Raulie (1989)

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 501 · 5 U.S.C. § 504 (Equal Access to Justice Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 8101 (Attendant Allowance Adjustment Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 8124 · 5 U.S.C. § 8127 · 5 U.S.C. § 8128 · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · United States v. Fausto · Library of Congress v. Shaw · Block v. Community Nutrition Institute

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an adjudication under section 554 of [title 5] in which the position of the United States is represented by counsel or otherwise, but excludes an adjudication for the purpose of establishing or fixing a rate or for the purpose of granting or renewing a license.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he use of a concrete term such as 'defined' leads us to believe it probable that Congress intended precisely the opposite interpretation of section 504(b)(1)(C) from the one taken by the Ninth Circuit.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “an agency adjudication defined under the Administrative Procedure[ ] Act where the agency takes a position through representation by counsel or otherwise.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.