Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 860 F.2d 1407 - First National Bank of Cicero v. Lewco Securities Corp

First National Bank of Cicero v. Lewco Securities Corp’s Empirical Analysis

860 F.2d 1407 · 1988

Citation profile

150
cited by 150 later decisions
5
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 150 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Winback & Conserve Program, Inc. (1994), Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F. Lafferty & Co. (2001)

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

10101988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 656

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 150 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “adverse agent is also the sole representative of the principal in the transaction in question.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This 'sole actor' exception is founded on the notion that, where a principal cannot embrace a transaction except through the acts of an unsupervised agent, the principal must accept the consequences of the agent's misconduct because it was the principal who allowed the agent to operate without accountability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.