Rendleman v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
860 F.2d 1537 · 1988
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Roedler v. Department of Energy (2001), United States v. Hatcher (1991)
29 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 202 · 42 U.S.C. § 254D · 42 U.S.C. § 254F · 42 U.S.C. § 254L · 42 U.S.C. § 254M · 42 U.S.C. § 254N
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co. · Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham · United States v. Locke · Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the maldistribution of health care manpower in the United States,”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]hese conditions do not arise from a negotiated agreement between the parties; rather they are provided for in the statute. Statutory intent, therefore, is more relevant to the interpretation of these conditions than are common law contract principles....”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The very purpose of this Congressional program is to have new health care professionals deliver medical services to areas suffering shortages of medical personnel.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.