Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 860 F.2d 321 - Tribble v. Gardner

Tribble v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

860 F.2d 321 · 1988

Citation profile

124
cited by 124 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

76 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Soranno's Gasco, Inc. v. Morgan (1989), Fuller v. Mg Jewelry (1991)

76 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

7701988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Estelle v. Gamble · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Bell v. Wolfish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “government officials performing discretionary functions ... are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “look[s] at all available decisional law including decisions ... of other circuits”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'clearly established' in a more particularized, and hence more relevant, sense: The contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.... [I]n the light of preexisting law the unlawfulness must be apparent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.