Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 860 F.2d 60 - City Capital Associates Limited Partnership v. Interco Incorporated

City Capital Associates Limited Partnership v. Interco Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis

860 F.2d 60 · 1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
January 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2008

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

100198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “material to a decision by a security holder ... whether to sell, tender or hold securities being sought in the tender offer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any person, directly or indirectly ... if, after consummation thereof, such person would, directly or indirectly, be the beneficial owner of more than 5 per centum of such class, unless ... such person has filed with the Commission a statement containing such of the information specified in section 78m(d) of this title, and such additional information as the Commission may by rules and regulations prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The persons seeking control ... have information about themselves and about their plans which, if known to investors, might substantially change the assumptions on which the market price is based. This bill is designed to make the relevant facts known so that shareholders have a fair opportunity to make their decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.