Norman v. Elkin’s Empirical Analysis
860 F.3d 111 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2022
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Rotella v. Wood · Kost v. Kozakiewicz · Klehr v. Ao Smith Corporation Ao · Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp. · Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) 6. Norman Files His § 220 Action and Subsequent Suit On November 16, 2004, Norman filed a § 220 action in the Delaware Court of Chancery, to compel USM to allow him to inspect the company's books and records. At a hearing in August 2005, former Vice Chancellor Parsons found”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Norman v. Elkin“granted only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant and giving it the advantage of every fair and reasonable inference, there is insufficient evidence from which a jury reasonably could find liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Norman v. Elkin“( Id. at 252 ) Norman asked Elkin to send him more information about the sales but never received it. ( See id. ) On October 2, 2002, Norman's attorney sent Elkin a letter requesting information pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 220”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Norman v. Elkin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.